🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and revealed fresh requests had come from mediators to restart discussions with the Trump administration. He said Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Path

Araghchi is treading a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more resilient defensively and psychologically from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Previous Talks Unexpectedly Terminated

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader asserting the sites had been destroyed. Afterward, EU nations employed their authority to restore international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that American atomic experts could work on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats stated three times they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Existing Situation

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be revived in various formats if talks reopen.

Trump in recent days stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of inactivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran asserts diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his speech to the gathering, aimed to paint the US as a dominant force that exploits the idea of international law, Araghchi said the two-week conflict demonstrated the clash could not be settled by military means. He asserted the assaults commenced with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were carried out with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making trust challenging to restore.

Negotiations Remains the Ultimate Solution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was America and the European states that had repeatedly attempted to impose their desires during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and continues the primary solution to resolve disputes, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be respected."

"Provided that they speak to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and honor, they will receive a reply in the equivalent language."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have come to know our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have developed more powerful, more cohesive, and more supportive of the government and the state in the face of this assault."